It can be hosted on-premises or used in the cloud, making GitHub vs GitLab comparisons vital for large enterprises. Another deciding factor for choosing between GitLab vs. GitHub is the pricing. GitHub has a free tier, unlimited public and private repos which is perfect for open source projects. But while paid plans do offer advanced features, like GitHub Actions and enterprise security, they are unavailable in free plans.
We take security and privacy seriously
- In GitLab, users have different access levels in a particular group or project based on their respective roles.
- I suggest starting with their free plans to get an idea of how your workflow operates on each platform and then look into subscribing to the one that works best for you.
- If GitLab doesn’t offer an integration with a tool you use regularly, but GitHub does, that will make it the obvious choice for you.
- Both platforms offer a wide range of collaboration, code review, and project management tools.
We’ll explore GitHub vs GitLab for developers, focusing on their features, similarities, differences, pricing, and overall user experience to help you choose the right platform. Git is a free and open-source distributed version control system designed to handle projects of any size with speed and efficiency. Unlike centralized systems, Git allows developers to work independently with a full copy of the codebase on their local machines. GitHub has polished community features like Discussions, Sponsors, and a broader ecosystem of third-party integrations. GitLab, while more utilitarian, focuses on workflow depth and DevOps efficiency.
When to Choose GitHub
If you’re heavily involved in open source or community engagement, GitHub’s interface will feel more comfortable. If your work leans toward enterprise or infrastructure, GitLab’s UI may offer the power you’re looking for. GitLab offers a fully featured self-managed version that replicates nearly all the functionalities of its SaaS counterpart. It’s ideal for companies with strict compliance, privacy, or security requirements.
Differences between GitHub and GitLab — the core features
And they can do it without setting up a virtual LAN or manually sharing repositories. What sets it apart from traditional version control is that you can work on different branch versions of the software and manage them all simultaneously. A VCS makes it easy for multiple developers, designers, and team members to work together on the same project, ensuring that everyone has the same access to the latest code and can track all modifications. Both run on Linux servers, come with issue trackers and offer a wide range of third-party integrations and import tools. As seen above the graphical interface is a big help when looking at differences (“diffs”) between branches and has additional features such as commenting (and emojis). A remote repository is a version of your project that is hosted remotely, so not on your own computer but on the internet or a network.
The second key difference is that GitLab offers its own deployment platform built on Kubernetes. With GitHub you would need to use an external platform, like AWS or Heroku and trigger your deploys there. When you first start programming you’ll often hear that you should always version control your code. It is fascinating to take note that even though GitHub currently offers free private vaults, it can’t rival GitLab yet. In many individuals’ brains, GitLab is the spot to go for private stores and GitHub for public ones. He helped build the Contentful App Framework and now works with developers that want to take advantage of it.
Git’s Key Features
Understanding the differences between these tools can help you choose the right one for your project. This article will explore the key differences between GitLab and GitHub, covering their features, benefits, and pricing. It’s a powerful version control system difference between github and gitlab that simplifies code management for teams by tracking every modification. This record of changes not only makes it easy to revisit previous versions and reduces the risk of losing work. GitLab shines as the preferred choice for organizations, as well as those seeking a comprehensive DevOps toolchain.
Why Is GitHub More Popular than GitLab?
- If your team values security, custom permissions, or on-premise deployments, it makes sense to adopt GitLab.
- If you do need the bells and whistles of a hosted Git service, however, then let me break it down — from the differences in software services to similarities in interfaces and core values.
- Only with Git do you have the freedom to work on various versions at once.
It depends on your team, larger organization, goals, and unique use cases. GitHub Actions automations make CI/CD possible without third-party tools, but you won’t have the same oversight level. Developers on either platform can easily fork the project to start making their changes and experimenting with them. Let’s go beyond the feature list and look at how the two match up to Git specifically. You can then test them by merging them with a staging branch and the live version when you finalize a better variant.
Quick Fixes for Common Kubernetes Issues
In addition to Linux, his areas of expertise include IT security, Python, Swift, Java, and the Raspberry Pi. You can add members to projects and groups and assign them roles such as Guest, Reporter, Developer, Maintainer, or Owner. These roles determine the level of access and permissions granted to each member.
This vibrant ecosystem encourages collaboration, knowledge sharing, and the development of reusable code and tools. Both platforms support external authentication methods, such as SAML and LDAP, enabling integration with existing identity providers and centralized user management. This can be particularly useful for larger organizations with complex access control requirements. Git is an open-source version control system that lets developers save snapshots of their codebase. These snapshots track every change, no matter how small, making it easier to maintain high coding standards. Git’s branching feature allows developers to work on different versions of a project simultaneously, merging changes only when they’re ready.
Security tools such as Dependabot are offered by GitHub, but in order to get security ‘features’, you have to pay for GitHub’s enterprise plans. Even though GitLab is much more popular, it has a less extensive community, but there is very extensive documentation, enterprise support, and professional training. GitHub is the platform of choice for open source projects, but in the case of enterprise projects that require dedicated enterprise services, GitLab’s premium services might be a bit more suitable. There is something similar about both interfaces, which are both modern and user friendly, but GitHub is usually considered simpler and more intuitive for beginners. While feature rich GitLab is overwhelming due to all the tools and configurable items it has.
Choose GitLab if you need to build Docker images or other large artifacts, or if you need to self-host or have better infrastructure-as-code support. Let’s consider a monorepo app with Next.js and Node.js code, that needs to be built and have tests run every time there’s a push to the main branch. With a strong focus on DevOps practices and an integrated toolset, GitLab caters to organizations seeking a more seamless and automated software delivery process.